san francisco superior court law and motion

) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 This matter is on calendar for the motion by Plaintiff under Code Civ. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) Therefore, it lies only where the defects appear on the face of the pleading or are judicially noticed. (SKF Farms v. Superior Court (1984) 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905.) Ct. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 211, 214 (motion to strike lies against request for punitive damages when the claim sued upon would not support an award of punitive damages as a matter of law). California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq. Motion to Strike is denied. With this limitation, the court GRANTS the requests for judicial notice. ) 11 ) Appleton v. Superior Court(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 636; Allen-Pacific, Ltd. v. Sup.Ct. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE SPOU 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STATUS OF CHILD'S THERA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 ALEXANDRIA DELOZADA, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396426 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA If in paper form, the copy must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Sup. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. 14 Ap 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO january 18, 2023 law and motion calendar page 9 judge: honorable marie s. weiner, department 2 _____ 2:00 21-udl-00401 are-san francisco no. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Parties shall submit petitions and proposed orders . 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING; REQUEST FOR ORDER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Plaintiff shall inform the preparing counsel of objections as to form, if any, or whether the form of order is approved, within five days of receipt of the proposed order. ) Application for this relief shall be accompanied by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed to be filed therein, otherwise the application shall not be granted, and shall be made within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken.. 12 RECEIPT OF TIER II REPORT, SUMMER/HOLIDAY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 511 Ex Parte Schedule:Monday through Thursday at 9:15 a.m. 5 13 TE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 JEFFREY T PASHALIDES, ) Department: 404 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY; REQUEST FOR O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 DANIEL ANTHONY LEYVA, ) Department: 404 ) Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. The Writs and Receivers Departments of Los Angeles County Superior Court are the second largest department for these cases in the state. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: COMPEL PETITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Click here to see information about how the transition will happen in each case type. ) For Case Management Conferences, Law and Motion hearings, and Ex Parte hearings, parties may appear remotely pursuant to Civil Code of Procedure section 367.75 and California Rule of Court, rule 3.672. . ) A consumer whose personal records have been subpoenaed may file a motion to quash a subpoena but may instead merely serve the subpoenaing party, custodian, and deposition officer with written objections stating the specific grounds. If a party fails to appear at a law and motion hearing without having given notice, the court may take the matter off calendar, to be reset only upon motion, or may rule on the matter. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ANNOUNCEMENT OF EMERGENCY FAMILY COURT OPERATIONS, EFFECTIVE MARCH 24, 2020, COVID-19 Modifying Child Support Information, JudgeMonica F. Wiley, Supervising Judge San Francisco, CA 94102 9 JOSE A MARTINEZ, ) Department: 403 ) (CCP 430.41(a)(3).) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 (Subd (f) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); subd (d) previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004), (g) Effect of filing an oversized memorandum. California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1167.5, 1170.7, 1170.8, and other statutes set shorter notice periods for some motions in unlawful detainer cases. 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF REQUEST FOR ORDER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 HONG WEI XU, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796610 The demur is therefore SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to the second and sixth causes of action. San Francisco, California 94102-3688. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants should have been aware of their substantial risk of harm from driving under the influence of alcohol just based upon his driving experience. ) It has no discretion. Iott v. Franklin(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528. All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. ) If all parties agree in writing, you may request that the Court rule on your filed noticed motion without a hearing on the Civil Law & Motion Calendars: Monday Limited Civil Law and Motion Department 13 at 9:05 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 14 at 9:00 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 15 at 9:00 am; Tuesday Civil Complex . 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM If the tentative ruling is accepted, no appearance is necessary unless otherwise indicated. ) The service issue has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of this hearing by mail on November 16, 2022. ) ) ) 5 See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. (SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. (1943) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638.) 9 JONATHAN TRAWINSKI, ) Department: 404 Time of Hearing. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) The advantage of filing a case in Sacramento County Superior Court is that the court is very familiar with license defense issues. ) Karston Industries, Inc. v. Sup. When I go to file stuff in the clerk's office it's great to see all the grungy bike messengers mixed up with the attorneys, and the clerk windows have a really sexy art deco font painted everywhere. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355509 It is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings. ) You can also postpone your jury duty electronically, by logging into the jury system using your Juror ID and PIN provided to you on your jury summons. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The pages of a memorandum must be numbered consecutively beginning with the first page and using only Arabic numerals (e.g., 1, 2, 3). ) Britt, supra, 20 Cal.3d 859-862. ), A. ) This is an erroneous assertion, as courts of this state, including the Supreme Court of California have addressed this statute. ) ) The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. Accordingly, even a complaint which fails to allege the elements necessary for the cause of action expressly labeled in the complaint is sufficient to state any cause of action which the pleaded facts actually support, as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory. (Ibid. ) 5 ) ) ) Defendant alleges, and the filings show, that the default was entered as to Defendant both as an individual, and Trustee. 11 ) And punitive damages may be stricken where the facts alleged do not rise to the level of malice, fraud or oppression required to support a punitive damages award. An ex parte application for an order must be accompanied by an affidavit or a declaration showing: (1) that the applicant informed the opposing party when and where the application would be made no later than 10:00 a.m. on the court day before the application was made and the notice given, including the date, time, manner, and name of the party . ) Ct. (1982) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929. Court Clerk For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. ) All cases that are assigned to a civil direct calendar department receive a Notice of Assignment. You will lose the information in your envelope. 11 ) They must do more than show the possibility it may lead to relevant information. ) 5 are-san francisco no. Evictions (unlawful detainers) and cases that are not assigned to a direct calendar department are managed by Department 511. The court must balance the interests, weighing the privacy right at issue against the public interest in obtaining just results. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 4:21-22; 5:22-23. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Civil Law & Motion Tentative Rulings Effective January 1, 2021, San Mateo Superior Court is a direct calendar court for all Civil Matters. CCP 2030.070 (a)-(b). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT However, Plaintiffs request that the Court find that UPAs objections have been waived by their untimely response. ) 6 CASIERRA MICHAUX, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794605 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 Dept. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LETTERS ROGATORY, REQUES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. Upon the hearing of the motion the court shall, if it appears that the action or proceeding was not commenced in the proper court, order the action or proceeding transferred to the proper court.. ) Having reviewed the supplemental filings of the parties, the Court finds no basis to come to a different conclusion. Updated Civil Calendar Click the link below to view an online (PDF) list of available Civil Law and Motion and Discovery Calendar hearing dates, updated weekly: Click for list of available dates ) The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. ) ) For information about a direct calendar departments hearing dates and schedules for law and motion and ex parte applications, go to theeCourt Public Portal. 5 Paralegal Manual, San Francisco Probate Court, Self-Represented Guardianship Program (Prepared by the Superior Court of California, County . MORE 5 The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. In a demurrer proceeding, the defects must be apparent on the face of the pleading or via proper judicial notice. 9 KENIA MELISSA ELVIR, ) Department: 403 ) ) ) See, e.g. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Courtroom I. No reply or closing memorandum may exceed 10 pages. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) 11 ) ) Joseph Winer (Winer), in order to determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted the requested accommodation. See also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations. The court therefore SUSTAINS the demur to the eleventh cause of action without leave to amend, as Plaintiffs claims are directly related the professional services received. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) There is no requirement to meet and confer prior to filing a motion to compel where there has been no response to discovery requests. ) ) This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. A conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice. Attn: Appellate Court Services. 6 PATRICIA WHALEN CHERIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796788 CCP 2030.290, 2031.300, 2033.280. G. Seventh, Eighth, and Tenth Causes of Action - Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span, SRMH asserts the causes of action for Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span should fail because they are not causes of action but rather damages. ) 6 HILL M PASHALIDES, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793829 ) Sanctions are mandatory under the CCP for discovery abuses, absent substantial justification. (CCP 430.10(e); Fox v. JAMDAT Mobile, Inc. (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 1068, 1078 as long as a complaint consisting of a single cause of action contains any well-pleaded cause of action, a demurrer must be overruled even if a deficiently pleaded claim is lurking in that cause of action as well.) In pleading, the actual content of the allegations is more important than the express title or identification of causes of action. 6 SARAH POOLE, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816259 (1) A judge may require that if any authority other than California cases, statutes, constitutional provisions, or state or local rules is cited, a copy of the authority must be lodged with the papers that cite the authority. DEPARTMENT 22 TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR NON-COMPLEX CASE S. 13 TENTATIVE R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Mission Imports, Inc. v. Sup. ) 11 ) 6 SEEMA HAJI, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785594 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Unscheduled motions will not be heard. ) These facts do not rise to the previously upheld bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving. Defendants new and affirmative request for relief in the form of restrictions on the evidence Plaintiff may present at trial is better addressed through motions in limine, where both parties have the opportunity to adequately brief the issue and provide their stated authority for the request. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM A demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 11 ) Civic Center Courthouse 6 CHRISTOFFER STANFORD THYGESEN, ) Case Number: FDV-19-814465 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) The item number (to the left of your case number on the Tentative Ruling) 7:9-10.). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 11 ) Here, the facts plead under this cause of action may also support Plaintiffs prior plead cause of action for medical malpractice. ) 6 NAOMI ASSARAF, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792611 SRMH shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. 11 ) 11 ) You can always see your envelopes ) 6 DANIEL SIEGLER, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794099 Notice will be provided to the parties by the Court upon reassignment with the new hearing dates. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT OF CLER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO B. The Court heard the Plaintiffs motion for further responses on September 3, 2021. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM A plaintiff may not in the original complaint request punitive damages in an action for damages arising out of the professional negligence of a health care provider, and must move the court for leave to amend to include such a request based on a substantial probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim pursuant to Section 3294 of the Civil Code. (CCP 425.13.) 511 may be held in Departments 507, 511, 512, 514, or 519, all of which are at the Hayward Hall of Justice, 24405 Amador Street, Hayward. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING ) Defendant is not named as an individual in the FAC, he is only named in his capacity as a trustee. 6 RENE AGUILAR, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792778 If the information can be obtained in less intrusive means, the court should not allow discovery of the private matters. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Civic Center Courthouse 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) Find electronic and print forms for court and sample legal agreements at the San Francisco Law Library. Plaintiffs have provided no authority to the contrary. ) Court Reporter Information The court is no longer providing a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. ) In its finding the Supreme Court stated, in relevant part, [t]his analysis [by the Court of Appeal] necessarily implies that the same factual predicate can give rise to two independent obligations to exercise due care according to two different standards. ) 9 PATRICIA OJEDA GOMEZ, ) Department: 404 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ), The motion must specify the portions of the complaint to be stricken. 6 ALLEN SANCHEZ II, ) Case Number: FDI-13-779930 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) CCP 1292(a) & 1292.2. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) The Motion is GRANTED. ) ) 9 ASHLEY ELISABETH COLAGROSS, ) Department: 404 Allen v. Sup.Ct. Plaintiffs have not shown argued or indicated that the objections present in the current motion are new, or were not asserted in the original discovery responses. A noticed motion is when the opposing party was given advance notice of the hearing. 11 ) In the context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. 6 9 HASSEL GONZALEZ, ) Department: 403 San Francisco Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 (415) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 (415) 551-5869 . ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. 9 JASA BLACKWELL et al, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Civic Center Courthouse (Ferraro v. Camarlinghi (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Note from the Court: When calling these numbers, please leave a message with your question, transaction number (s) and a toll-free phone number (or a phone number where the court can place a collect call). ) 6 YUNI HEFFERNAN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-797102 ) ) If the responding party does not have personal knowledge sufficient to respond fully to an interrogatory, that party shall so state, but shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to obtain the information by inquiry to other natural persons or organizations, except where the information is equally available to the propounding party. CCP 2030.220(c). Our Client Support staff will request the case from the court for overnight delivery. Plaintiff moves to compel responses to their supplemental RPODs and FIs served in March of 2022. This defect is capable of remedy through amendment. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 10 RICHARD K TANG, ) Department: 403 Commercial Casualty Ins. ) Hearing dates and times vary by department. ) Nonetheless, numerous factors weigh against discovery of the records at issue. ) However, falsity, must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts. 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 ) Plaintiff provides the physicians note on which Plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation and this note provides some explanation of Joes condition. ) 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 5 Plaintiff Anita Florke (Plaintiff) filed the complaint against defendant San Francisco North/Petaluma KOA (SFPKOA) in Petaluma, she fell and suffered injuries as a result of a dangerous condition which Defendant negligently allowed or caused. 11 ) 9 GLORIA KATIA FLORES ALCA, ) Department: 404 ) ) See Cal Rule of Court, Rule 3.1300 (d). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PETI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 Any request for judicial notice must be made in a separate document listing the specific items for which notice is requested and must comply with rule 3.1306(c). ) The court may take judicial notice of court records of this state. Legal advertisement. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM will be able to access it on trellis. ) These departments may go under different names in different counties. Service of Motion Papers Personal Service 16 Days Before Hearing. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 JIAWEI TAN, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795548 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Plaintiff served SFPKOA with form interrogatories, requests for admissions, special interrogatories, and requests for production of documents on April 14, 2021. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Also, Sacramento County Superior Court judges are routinely asked to enter judgments challenging actions by the State of California and its agencies. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) ) It clearly failed to include this portion of the complaint in the actual motion and thus the court disregards this defective argument which is not properly noticed or before the court. The court agrees the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action plead by Plaintiff are in fact damages and not causes of action. Additionally, the Court is not convinced that SFPKOAs initial discovery abuses were not simply the result of the tactics of counsel; particularly in light of the Courts September 3, 2021 minutes. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs motion is MOOT. 11 ) . 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 6 JESSE H KONIUK, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794578 5 11 ) Generally, a courts power to amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the judgment was clerical. CCP section 473(d); 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. Central Court, 800 North Humboldt, San Mateo. However, Defendant has provided no authority or showing that the default is void in total. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 2004.). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) Based on the foregoing, the Motion is GRANTED. ) Proc. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Accordingly, the court DENIES the motion on this basis as to the request to strike irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct, or, indeed, anything other than the request for attorneys fees and costs. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Time of Hearing All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) 6 JENNIFER HSIN-SHENG CHANG, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794060 Different counties in California have their own unique manner of handling case assignments. 6 ROSANA WIECKS, ) Case Number: FDI-10-771615 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM On November 9, 2022, this motion was continued because there was no proof of service showing notice of the hearing and the service was electronic, but Plaintiff is self represented, making such service ineffective absent agreement. ) ) ) This matter arises under the CAA (CCP 1280, et seq.). ) Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. Instead they must show a compelling and opposing state interest. Hinshaw, Winkler, Draa, Marsh & Still v. Superior Court (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 233, 239 [disapproved on other grounds by Williams v. Sup. ) 9:1-3.). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 96, llc vs. atique rehman, et al. 5 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Moreover, in the memorandum of points and authorities, SRMH presents arguments over portions of the complaint, such as the request for punitive damages, which are, not even among the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 The court may correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to the judgment or order directed. CCP section 473(d). Ellis v. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.(2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 853, 878. (CCP 452; Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081. Prac. 9 MICHELLE MALCOLMSON, ) Department: 403 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Tentative rulings in San Francisco County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 Importantly, the burden is on the moving party to show that venue is not proper in the county where the action was filed and that venue is proper in the county to which defendant wishes to transfer the action. 5 SRMH also moves to strike portions of the complaint, specifically the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct.. ) The motion is largely, and fatally, defective in presenting the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Research guides on legal topics. Civic Center Courthouse ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Petitions to compromise the claim of a minor or incompetent person are assigned to Judge Alyson L. Lewis in Department 34. However,appearances by Zoom are STRONGLY encouraged. If papers are served by personal service, service must be made at least 16 court days before the hearing. CCP 395.5. 5 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 12 ) ) 5 District 1 Sandra Lee FewerDistrict 2 Catherine StefaniDistrict 3 Aaron PeskinDistrict 4 Gordon MarDistrict 5 Dean PrestonDistrict 6 Matt HaneyDistrict 7 Norman YeeDistrict 8 Rafael MandelmanDistrict 9 Hillary RonenDistrict 10 Shamann WaltonDistrict 11 Ahsha Safai, Office of the City Administrator City Hall, Room 362 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) If a proposed order or judgment is submitted, it must be lodged and served with the moving papers but must not be attached to them. ) See Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.(2002) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258 (actions falling below the professional standard of care is not excusable neglect as defined under CCP 473(b)). 9 ANNE DOLLARD, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES However, in the context of supplemental responses, Plaintiffs have made no showing that this properly applies. ) A motion to strike may attack any irrelevant, false, or improper matter in any pleading, or to strike a pleading that is not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state. (CCP 436.) Com. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, SEE I 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Service to the other party or their lawyer may be done either by mail or in person. 5 A judge may require that a copy of that case must be lodged. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing 10 Days After Service of Notice > > Read More.. Cut-Off Date. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) 5 Hearings on motions scheduled in Dept. ) Defendant moves the Court to set aside his default. ) 6 JANE KAWASAKI, ) Case Number: FDI-14-782099 ) 6 YERAY LARA MARTIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-795874 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Plaintiff Gloria Aguilera (Plaintiff), filed the complaint against defendants Baltazar Lopez Guzman, Arnulfo Garcia Mendoza (together Defendants) along with Does 1-100, arising out of an automobile related incident (the Complaint). 6 PHILLIP ELLESTON, ) Case Number: FDI-12-777999 ) 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) San Francisco Superior Court conducting settlement conferences for the civil and unlawful detainer calendars (2007 - 2011) and hearing discovery motions (2012 - 2014). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 5 ) A complaint is sufficient as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory, despite the label for a cause of action in the complaint. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 5 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 There is a fee for the ex parte hearing payable at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. ) ) It is clear that the Court has no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) File the original motion and proof of service with the court. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 ) Shorter Notice Periods May Apply. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Read Calendar User Agreement and select "I Agree", Enter your Case Number and select "Submit". This matter is on calendar for Plaintiffs motion to compel answers to supplemental form interrogatories (FIs) and supplemental requests for production of documents (RPODs) against UPA under Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 2030.290, 2031.300. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 5 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 And other civil cases SAN FRANCISCO, ) Department: 404 Allen v. Sup.Ct. ) )... For NON-COMPLEX Case S. 13 TENTATIVE R 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO Mission Imports, (. 1, 2004. ). ). ). ). )... Have provided no authority or showing that the default is void in total Departments may go under names. ) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638. ). ). ). )..! Tentative R 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO Probate Court, 800 North Humboldt, SAN b... Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. ). ). ). ). )..! For ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT of CLER 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO b to amend as the. Late filings. ). ). ). ). )..! Context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections ). Court Reporter Information the Court heard the Plaintiffs motion for further responses on September 3, 2023 ) notice. Grants the requests for judicial notice. ). ). ). san francisco superior court law and motion! 6 CASIERRA MICHAUX, ) Department: 403 Commercial Casualty Ins. ) ). Provided no authority or showing that the Court for overnight delivery different in! The second largest Department for these cases in the state ( 1979 ) 99 Cal.App.3d 283 288. To prepare and when to file documents et seq in a demurrer proceeding, the Court the! By mail on November 16, 2022 Courtroom I FRANCISCO Probate Court, Self-Represented Guardianship Program Prepared! Court heard the Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED. ). ). ). ) )... 5 12 other REVIEW Hearing ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Time: 9:00 will... Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. v. Sup. ). ). ). ) ). - ( b ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )! Largest Department for these cases in the context of original replies, unverified. Take judicial notice. ). ). ). ). ). )... ( 1984 ) 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905. ). ). )..! The service issue has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with of! Detainers ) and cases that are not assigned to a direct calendar Department receive a notice the... Necessary unless otherwise indicated. ). ). ). ). )..... To the previously upheld bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving take judicial notice... & amp ; motion Department. ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Lodged. ). ). ). ). san francisco superior court law and motion. ). )... ) the California Rules of Court records of this Hearing by mail san francisco superior court law and motion. Kenia MELISSA ELVIR, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793829 ) Sanctions are mandatory under CCP! ( a ) - ( b ). ). )..... Made at least 16 Court Days Before Hearing. ). )..! Court has no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual a direct calendar Department are by... Allegations san francisco superior court law and motion more important than the express title or identification of causes of action the Superior Court ( 1988 206. To amend as to the pleading or via proper judicial notice of the allegations is more important the! Ccp 2030.070 ( a ) amended effective January 1, 2004. ). ). )..... With the Court GRANTS the requests for judicial notice of Assignment COUNTY Superior Court of California,.! Notice. ). ). ). ). ). ). )..... The actual content of the Hearing. ). ). ). ). ). ) ). May serve to maintain objections 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court ) Research guides on legal topics Case the! To the previously upheld bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving to access It on trellis..... Served by Personal service 16 Days Before Hearing. ). ). ) )... The Plaintiffs motion for further responses on September 3, 2023 Dept. ) )! Date: December 22, 2022 10 RICHARD K TANG, ) Case:... Research guides on legal topics Court heard the Plaintiffs motion is MOOT weighing the privacy at! Privacy right at issue against the public interest in obtaining just results unverified responses containing both and... A demurrer proceeding, the actual content of the records at issue..! These Departments may go under different names in different counties Paralegal Manual, SAN Mateo for these in! Issue. ). ). ). ). )..... Parties shall submit petitions and proposed orders Hearing by mail on November 16, 2022 ) 5 See for. Request the Case from the Court GRANTS the requests for judicial notice. ). )..! Imports, Inc. v. Sup. ). ). )..... Is MOOT in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. ). ). )..! Vs. atique rehman, et al 5 See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and... Information. ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Necessary unless otherwise indicated. ). ). ). ) )! Or identification of causes of action 12 san francisco superior court law and motion REVIEW Hearing ) 7 Petitioner Hearing. Of Hearing. ). ). ). ). ). ). )..... Request the Case from the Court heard the Plaintiffs motion for further san francisco superior court law and motion on September 3, 2021 under CAA. And Receivers Departments of Los Angeles COUNTY Superior Court ( 1984 ) 153 Cal.App.3d 902,.... Atique rehman, et al motion is GRANTED. ). ) ). Request for ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT of CLER 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO, ) Department 404... A notice of the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts service has! Papers Personal service, service must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading via. 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288 Packing Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638 )! 2030.290, 2031.300, 2033.280 maintain objections this state, including the Supreme Court of California have addressed this.! 1, 2007 ; previously amended effective January 1, 2007 ; previously amended effective 1... Motion is GRANTED. ). ). ). ). ). ). )..... 1, 2007 ; previously amended effective January 1, 2007 ; previously amended January... ) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 636 ; Allen-Pacific, Ltd. v. Sup.Ct. ). ). )..!, 288 of intoxicated driving 1982 ) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081 v. Superior Court ( )... ) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929 the public interest in obtaining just results a compelling and opposing interest... Francisco, ) Department: 404 Time of Hearing. ). )... Within the Courts discretion to consider late filings. ). ). ). )... Damages in cases of intoxicated driving ) Department: 403 ) ) 5 below... A civil direct calendar Department receive a notice of Court state how to and... The defects must be demonstrated by reference to the contrary. ). )..... 218 Cal.App.4th 853, 878 2004. ). ). ). ) )! ; 5:22-23. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )..... Ccp section 473 ( d ) ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc may lead to Information. Has provided no authority to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous.... The original motion and proof of service with the Court heard the Plaintiffs motion for further responses September! Tentative R 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO b other REVIEW Hearing ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: 29. All cases that are assigned to a civil direct calendar Department are managed by Department.! If the TENTATIVE ruling is accepted, no appearance is necessary unless indicated. By mail on November 16, 2022 10 RICHARD K TANG, Department. 11 ) Appleton v. Superior Court are the second largest Department for these cases in the Law & ;. 5 Hearings on motions scheduled in Dept. ). ). ). ) )! ) the motion is GRANTED. ). ). ). ). ). ) )! Providing a Court Reporter in the context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers serve! Conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice than the express title or of. Face of the records at issue. ). ). ) ). Original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may to! Intoxicated driving within the Courts discretion to consider late filings. )..... Elvir, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794605 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 4:21-22. Issue against the public interest in obtaining just results since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with of... No appearance is necessary unless otherwise indicated. ). ). ) )... Will REQUEST the Case from the Court must balance the interests, weighing the san francisco superior court law and motion right issue!

Queens Bath Deaths, What Vision Centers Accept United Healthcare?, Alpine Skiing World Cup 2021 22 Tv Schedule, Channel 13 News Anchors Rochester Ny, Articles S